Legal Opinion

Big Vein Pocahontas Co. v. Browning

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1923PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.

*39Ollie H. Browning and her husband and children were the owners of certain coal lands in Tazewell county, Virginia, from which they had been mining and removing coal for several years, the mining operations being known as the “Browning Mines.”

On March 12,1909, Ollie H. Browning in her own right and as guardian of her son, James S. Browning, Jr., and her husband, James S. Browning, who were the then owners of the property, executed a deed of lease to Thomas T.Boswell, by which they demised, let and leased to him for a period of fifty years from the first day of April, 1909, unless the coal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Hamilton v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Wren v. Hynes' administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  4. Lovett v. Steam Saw Mill Ass'nNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  5. Clark v. Farmers' Woollen Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1836

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. Reynolds Jamaica Mines, Ltd. v. La Societe Navale CaennaiseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  3. William C. Atwater & Co. v. Fall River Pocahontas Collieries Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. United States v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API