Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ramsey

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Caroline county in an action of trover. Judgment for the Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, J.,

(after making the foregoing statement) delivered the opinion of the court.

The controversy in this case grows out of the agreement attached to the agreed statement of facts. By that instrument the defendants sold to the plaintiff all the growing timber (except pine and cedar) on a designated parcel of land, and gave him two years from that date in which “to cut and remove said timber,” and a right of way, describing its course, from that land to a public highway. The controversy here depends upon the meaning of the words “to cut and remove” as used in the agreement.

There is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stuart v. PennisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. King v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Young v. Camp Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. Commonwealth v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  5. Brown v. Surry Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. First American Title Insurance v. Seaboard Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. A. C. Tuxbury Lumber Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  5. Hartley v. NeavesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API