Legal Opinion

Russell v. Mutual Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1925No. 18909. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fullerton, J. —

The questions presented on this ap-peal, in some of their aspects, were before this court in the case of Russell v. Mutual Lumber Co., 124 Wash. 109, 213 Pac. 461, 216 Pac. 891. It is stated in the briefs of counsel, although it does not otherwise appear from the record, that, after that cause had been remanded by this court, issue was taken on the allegations of the complaint and a trial entered upon, which ’ was terminated by a voluntary nonsuit taken by the plaintiff therein. Following the entry of the nonsuit, the plaintiff instituted the present action upon the contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Russell v. Mutual Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Granger v. BoullsWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Beaulaurier v. Washington State Hop Producers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Large v. ShivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API