Legal Opinion

Granger v. Boulls

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1944No. 29308PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Plaintiffs brought an action to abate a private nuisance and restrain certain violations of restrictive covenants running with the land of defendants. The court dismissed the nuisance action and restrained violations of the restrictive covenants running with the land. Defendants appeal.

Lake Ballinger is a small, fresh-water lake, located in Snohomish county a few miles outside of the corporate limits of the city of Seattle. All of the property abutting on the lake has been included in one plat, and has been divided into one- or two-acre tracts. Each person purchasing a tract fronting on Lake…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beaulaurier v. Washington State Hop Producers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Johns v. ClothesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Russell v. Mutual Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Walker v. BaxterWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Olson v. SpringerWashington Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Burton v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Alexander Schroeder Lumber Co. v. CoronaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. White v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API