Russell v. Mutual Lumber Co.

—In this action appellant asked damages against respondent for its failure and refusal to supply cedar shingle timber to appellant under a certain contract agreement between respondent, designated party of the first part, and Edgar J. Bordeaux, *110designated as party of the second part, dated the 18th day of October, 1913. The complaint alleges that Bordeaux erected a shingle mill upon certain property described in the contract, and thereafter sold, transferred and assigned his interest in the mill property and contract to appellant. The material portions of the contract, so far as this…