Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 6, 1986No. 85 Civ. 3826 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed this action against Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. (“Cushman & Wakefield”) a real estate brokerage firm, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The action was initiated on behalf of Barbara Hurley (“Hurley”), a former employee of Cushman & Wakefield, and similarly situated women in defendant’s workforce, including Virginia Clay (“Clay”) and Minnie Jamison (“Jamison”), who allege that Cushman & Wakefield has engaged in and continues to engage in employment practices…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sharkey v. Lasmo (AUL Ltd.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Trembczynski v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Polacek v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987