Legal Opinion
Sharkey v. Lasmo (AUL Ltd.)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 1998No. 94 Civ. 4699 (WCC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Daniel Sharkey brings this action against defendants Lasmo (AUL Ltd.) (“Lasmo”) and Ultramar Corporation (“Ultramar”) pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Sharkey, a Vice President and Manager for Ultramar Energy Limited (“UEL”) during all relevant times, alleges that due to his age, he was denied employment opportunities by defendants at the Lasmo pic companies created through a merger and reorganization involving UEL, and was ultimately terminated. Specifically, Sharkey…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miner v. Town of CheshireDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Daniel J. Sharkey, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lasmo (Aul Ltd.), Ultramar Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Konigsberg v. LefevreDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Sharkey v. Lasmo (Aul Ltd.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.