Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1913No. 11232PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered December 21, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is a suit to recover damages flowing from an alleged depletion of water in the plaintiffs’ well. The charge is that the water was lost in consequence of an explosion of a heavy blast of powder put off by the defendants. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for $250. The defendants are prosecuting the appeal. The material facts are these:

The respondents, at the time the blast was exploded and at the time of the trial, owned a tract of land' comprising nearly a half acre on the outskirts of the city of Seattle. It lies on the southerly slope of a steep hill which…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fitz Simons & Connell Co. v. Braun & FittsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Colton v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Brownfield v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Meeker v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Gerberg v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1918

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API