Hill v. State

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and thereafter found the enhancement paragraphs of the indictment to be true. Following the court’s assessment of the mandatory life sentence, appellant urges four grounds of error on appeal. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

By his first ground of error, appellant alleges the court committed fundamental error by charging the jury with a method of aggravated robbery not included in the indictment. The applicable portion of the indictment reads as follows:

[Appellant] ... did ... while in the course of…