Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1985No. 493-84PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

THOMAS G. DAVIS, Judge.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated robbery and thereafter found the enhancement paragraphs of the indictment to be true. The trial court assessed confinement for life. The First Court of Appeals (Houston) affirmed the conviction. Hill v. State, 666 S.W.2d 663 (1984). The Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in failing to conduct a hearing on the effectiveness of appellant’s court-appointed trial counsel. We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to examine that holding.

This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malcom v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Stovall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Asberry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  2. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Watkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
  4. Cain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API