Malcom v. State of Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McCORMICK, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction of burglary of a building; punishment was assessed at imprisonment for fifteen years. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
Appellant asserts three grounds of error dealing with the trial court’s denial of his pro se motion to dismiss his court-appointed counsel. On December 3, 1977, appellant was arrested and charged with burglary of a building. On December 6, 1977, appellant notified the court that he was indigent and requested the appointment of counsel. The court, complying with appellant’s request, appointed an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Lyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Rodriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Riggall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Lawton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Stearnes v. ClintonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- McKinny v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.