Legal Opinion

City of Marlow v. Parker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1936No. 25814PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The defendant city owned and operated a municipal light and power plant. Prom one of its lines the plaintiff received an electric shock which seriously injured him. He recovered a verdict and judgment therefor, and the defendant appeals.

The defendant’s first contention is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the finding that it was negligent. Prom the evidence the jury was warranted in believing the following to be the facts:

One of the defendant’s main distributing lines was strung along an alley, such line being about 18 feet above the ground. One hundred feet south of this line was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ladow v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. City of Durant v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Duncan Electric & Ice Co. v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. City of Altus v. WiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Couch v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Rudd v. Public Service Company of OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API