Legal Opinion

Forrest v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 1, 1939No. C. D. 169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, Judge:

This is an action against the United States to recover money claimed to have been collected in excess of the amount due upon importations of a commodity described on the invoices as feeding rolled oats from Canada imported into the port of Noyes, Minn. Two cases were consolidated and tried together. The collector of customs assessed duty on the importations at 80 cents per 100 pounds under the provision of paragraph 726 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “rolled oats.” That paragraph is in the following language:

Par. 726. Oats, hulled or unhulled, 16 cents per bushel of thirty-two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The MargaretSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ricks v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Emery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. Forrest v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Ricks v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Dollar Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API