Emery v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cline, Judge:.This is a suit against the United States arising at the port of St. Albans, protesting the collector’s assessment of duty on merchandise invoiced as “hulled oats.” It was described by the appraiser as “Mixed feed oats, hulled, with meager wheat, broken barley, weed seeds, etc.,” was advisorily classified as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and duty was so assessed by the collector. Although many claims which were not waived are made in the protest, plaintiff relies principally upon the claims that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- James Richardson & Sons, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Forrest v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- United States v. International Milling Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950