Legal Opinion

Ricks v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 24, 1941No. C. D. 535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keeee, Judge:

This action involves certain merchandise invoiced as barley bran a,nd assessed at San Diego with a duty of 20 per centum *64ad valorem under paragraph 1558, act.of 1930, as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable, either directly or by similitude, at 5 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 730, as amended by the Canadian Trade Agreement, T. D. 49752.

In support of such claims it is contended: First, that the merchandise is dutiable under said paragraph as “byproduct feeds obtained in milling wheat or other cereals,” because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Forrest v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Corporacion Argentina De Productores De Carnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boone v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  2. American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API