Legal Opinion

Hallowell v. McLaughlin Bros.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from, Pocahontas District Court.— Hon. W. B. Quarton, Judge. Suit to recover damages for breach of warranty of a stallion. There was a trial to a jury, and, after plaintiffs evidence had been introduced, there was a directed verdict for the defendants, and from a judgment on such verdict the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

In April, 1902, the defendants, a co-partnership, sold and delivered to the six plaintiffs named herein and to four of their neighbors, for the sum of $3,000, a stallion, known in the record as “ Gambetta V.” In their original petition, the plaintiffs alleged that the sale was made by a written contract, a copy of which was attached to the petition, marked Exhibit A, and made a part thereof. The following is a substantial copy of the same so far as material to the questions involved herein: “ Guarantee.— If the above named stallion • does not get sixty per cent, of the producing mares with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. James H. Love & Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Marshall Field Co. v. Oren Ruffcorn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Hefner v. HaynesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Johnson v. McGrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McLaughlin Brothers v. HallowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Clear Lake Co-Operative Live Stock Shippers' Ass'n v. WeirSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Wright v. MahaffaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Cedar Rapids National Bank v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Park v. BrandtIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API