In re Bishop
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
2Per curiam
Upon review of the findings and recommendations of Hearing Committee 5 and of the Disciplinary Board, and upon consideration of the evidence and of the briefs of the parties and of the record and oral argument, it is the decision of the Court that the Disciplinary Board’s recommendations be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ordered that L. Daniel Bishop, Jr. be suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of three years from the finality of this decision. It is further ordered that respondent make full restitution in the amount of $3,847.99, together with legal…
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cole v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- In Re HuddlestonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Champagne v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Champagne v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Erica Dandry Constanza, et al. v. Sparta Insurance Company, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026