Legal Opinion

In re Bishop

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 24, 1991No. 91-B-1597PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

2Per curiam

Upon review of the findings and recommendations of Hearing Committee 5 and of the Disciplinary Board, and upon consideration of the evidence and of the briefs of the parties and of the record and oral argument, it is the decision of the Court that the Disciplinary Board’s recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that L. Daniel Bishop, Jr. be suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of three years from the finality of this decision. It is further ordered that respondent make full restitution in the amount of $3,847.99, together with legal…

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. In Re HuddlestonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Champagne v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Champagne v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Erica Dandry Constanza, et al. v. Sparta Insurance Company, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API