Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Celotex Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1991No. W91-433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM A. CULPEPPER, Judge Pro Tem.

This writ application was filed by defendant-insurer requesting us to decide whether pre-comparative fault principles should be applied during the trial in which plaintiffs seek damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of exposure to asbestos during their employment. The trial court’s ruling dated April 25, 1991 found that comparative fault principles applied to questions of contribution among the defendants. This same issue is presented in Outher Cole, et al. v. Celotex Corporation, et at, 588 So.2d 376 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1991). Both suits were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BishopSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Champagne v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Champagne v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API