Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Celotex Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 28, 1992No. 91-C-2571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

599 So.2d 1086 (1992)

Homer CHAMPAGNE, et al.

v.

CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al.

No. 91-C-2571.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 1992.

Robert E. Kerrigan, Jr., A. Wendel Stout, III, Janet L. MacDonell, Marc J. Yellin, and Gary B. Roth, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, for applicant.

William B. Baggett, William B. Baggett, Jr., Rebecca S. Young, Baggett, McCall & Burgass, Lake Charles, Lawrence G. Pugh, III, Montgomery, Barnett, Brown, Read, Hammond & Mintz; Richard R. Forman; Larry G. Canada, J. Michael Johnson, Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins & Burr, New Orleans, James L. Pate, Ben L. Mayeaux,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Bell v. Jet Wheel Blast, Div. of Ervin IndustriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. In re BishopSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. Champagne v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Grefer v. Alpha TechnicalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Serv., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Pitre v. GAF Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API