Legal Opinion

In Re Huddleston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 2, 1992No. 91-B-2029PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

595 So.2d 1141 (1992)

In re Albert HUDDLESTON, Jr.

No. 91-B-2029.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 1992.

James Reed Barrow, G. Fred Ours, Elizabeth A. Alston, New Orleans, for LSBA.

John R. Martzell, Martzell, Thomas & Bickford, New Orleans, Albert Huddleston, Jr., Kenner, for respondent.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

LEMMON, Justice.

This is a disciplinary action against a member of the Louisiana State Bar Association based on his conviction of a serious crime under La.Sup.Ct.R. XIX, § 19. The Disciplinary Board, after reviewing the evidence presented to the Hearing Committee, issued a report to this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. DawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. O'HALLORANSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. In Re ReedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  4. In re BishopSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. SchoemannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. In Re ReddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. In Re StampsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. In re GaudinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  5. In re MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API