Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The issue presented on this appeal is whether codefendants in a personal injury tort action, in which no cross complaints have been served, may examine each other before trial, where no special circumstances are asserted. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288; Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a.) The defendant administrator appeals from a Special Term order, which vacated a notice of examination served on the codefendant trustee. The plaintiff is seeking recovery against both, and neither of the defendants has served cross complaints against the other.

There is a divergence in policy in some of the departments of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Johansen v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Frost v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Sommers v. New York World-Telegram Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Di Tucci v. DonatelliNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API