Schneider v. Doyle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The issue presented on this appeal is whether codefendants in a personal injury tort action, in which no cross complaints have been served, may examine each other before trial, where no special circumstances are asserted. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288; Rules Civ. Prac., rule 121-a.) The defendant administrator appeals from a Special Term order, which vacated a notice of examination served on the codefendant trustee. The plaintiff is seeking recovery against both, and neither of the defendants has served cross complaints against the other.
There is a divergence in policy in some of the departments of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Johansen v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Frost v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Sommers v. New York World-Telegram Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- Di Tucci v. DonatelliNew York Supreme Court · 1959