Legal Opinion

Hollien v. Tarrytown Daily News, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the article complained of is libelous per se if the jury finds that the article referred to plaintiff, and the charge of the learned trial court in this respect was correct. It was, however, error to charge “ that this is not a case for nominal damages of six cents.’’ (See Amory v. Vreeland, 125 App. Div. 850.) It was also error to charge that “ the law presumes malice from which punitive damages follows.” It is well settled that punitive damages cannot be awarded by the jury in the absence of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Amory v. VreelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Bresslin v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Tim v. HawesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campanella v. PursleyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Sommers v. New York World-Telegram Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API