Matter of Norris
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to G.S. 7A-289.30(e), findings of fact by the Court in a hearing on termination of parental rights must be based on clear, cogent and convincing evidence. Respondents contend that the evidence presented did not meet this standard. We disagree.
We have already summarized at length the trial court findings and other facts from the Record. Upon review of the testimony at trial and the Record, we conclude that such findings were based on clear, cogent and convincing evidence. We deal separately with each of respondents’ exceptions to the trial court findings.
First,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HedrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- In Re BiggersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Hines v. FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Mayberry v. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re D.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- In re L.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Matter of ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Walker v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.