Legal Opinion
In Re Biggers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided January 20, 1981No. 8019DC447PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Respondent urges reversal of the judgment on two bases: the unconstitutionality of G.S. 7A-289.32 and the insufficiency of the evidence to permit the termination of parental rights under the statute. We disagree with respondent’s contentions on both points and affirm.
At the outset, we must consider the inconsistency appearing in conclusion of law number three in which Judge Warren stated that grounds for termination existed “under G.S. 7A-289.32, subsections (1) and (3), as amended by Chapter 669 of the 1979 Session Laws____” Since the amendment repealed subsection (1) of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- In Re NesbittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Matter of PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.