Legal Opinion

Matter of Byrd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1985No. 8425DC593PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The trial court terminated the parental rights of respondents pursuant to G.S. 7A-289.32(2) and (4). We find that although parental rights were validly terminated pursuant to G.S. 7A-289.32(2), the evidence and findings did not support a termination under G.S. 7A-289.32(4). A valid finding of one of the statutorily enumerated grounds is sufficient to support an order terminating parental rights. In re Pierce, 67 N.C. App. 257, 312 S.E. 2d 900 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm.

Respondents first assign error to the admission into evidence of the court file on Yavonka Byrd,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. In re J.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. In re S.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. In re the Stewart ChildrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. In re M.N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API