Sargent v. Central National Bank & Trust Co. of Enid
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Chief Justice.
This certiorari proceeding tenders an issue of first impression — whether, and to what extent, § 24(Fifth) of the National Bank Act (12 U.S.C. § 21 et seq.) 1 preempts the Oklahoma law upon which the plaintiffs claim is based. We answer that pre-emption does not shield the defendant-bank from tort liability for dismissing an employee in violation of a state public policy which is consistent with the federal statute’s purpose. Actionability upon the plaintiffs contractual theories depends on whether under § 24(Fifth) the defense sought to be invoked is available. Because…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kathy Kroske, an Individual v. Us Bank Corp., a Foreign Corporation Dba U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Goonan v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Gilmore v. Enogex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.