Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Central National Bank & Trust Co. of Enid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1991No. 70796PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Chief Justice.

This certiorari proceeding tenders an issue of first impression — whether, and to what extent, § 24(Fifth) of the National Bank Act (12 U.S.C. § 21 et seq.) 1 preempts the Oklahoma law upon which the plaintiffs claim is based. We answer that pre-emption does not shield the defendant-bank from tort liability for dismissing an employee in violation of a state public policy which is consistent with the federal statute’s purpose. Actionability upon the plaintiffs contractual theories depends on whether under § 24(Fifth) the defense sought to be invoked is available. Because…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kathy Kroske, an Individual v. Us Bank Corp., a Foreign Corporation Dba U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Goonan v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Gilmore v. Enogex, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API