Legal Opinion

In Re Shaimas

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 10, 2008No. 06-492PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Petitioner Christopher M. Shaimas appeals from a superior court order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. Petitioner contends that the court erred in rejecting his claim that a material misunderstanding concerning parole eligibility rendered his guilty plea involuntary. We affirm.

¶ 2. In June 1994, petitioner was charged with aggravated sexual assault on a minor. The information alleged that petitioner had also been previously convicted of sexual assault. Conviction on the aggravated sexual assault charge carried a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. At a change-of-plea…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Silas T. McAdoo v. Frank Elo, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neil and Patricia Whitney v. Vermont Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Dennis K. Chandler v. Andrew A. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  3. In re BlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Edward F. Flanagan v. Nancy duMont (Flanagan)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. In re Reco JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API