Neil and Patricia Whitney v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. This case calls upon us to apply a “pollution exclusion” in an insurance policy for the second time in a year. Plaintiffs Neil and Patricia Whitney assert that damage to their home and personal property resulting from the spraying within their home of a pesticide known as chlorpyrifos is covered by their homeowners policy. Defendant Vermont Mutual Insurance Company (Vermont Mutual) argues that the pollution exclusion in the policy bars the Whitneys’ claim. The Rutland Superior Court, Civil Division, granted the Whitneys’ summary judgment motion on the question of coverage, concluding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Deni Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Great Lakes Chemical Corp. v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Department of Corrections v. Matrix Health Systems, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- Rainforest Chocolate, LLC v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Cindy Brillman v. New England Guaranty Insurance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Associates in Periodontics, PLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2021
- Hanover Ins Co v. the Media FactoryVermont Superior Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.