Legal Opinion
Armco Steel Co., LP v. CSX Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 6, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-1493PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Now before the Court are three motions filed by the defendants in this antitrust suit in which the plaintiff, Armco Steel Company (“Armco”), alleges that the defendant railroad companies conspired to artificially inflate the cost of transporting and handling iron ore in the Great Lakes region. Before the Court are the following mo tions: Defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation’s (“Conrad”) Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration; Defendants CSX Corp., CSX Transport., Inc. (“CSX”) and Toledo Ore Railroad Company’s (“TOR-CO”) Motion to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. LuckieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Montgomery v. STG International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. BosworthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.