Legal Opinion

Hudson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 23, 2011No. 40516-4-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.

¶1 United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Keith Hudson, who claimed time loss benefits through the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). The jury reversed a Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (Board) order reversing L&I’s determination that Hudson’s benefits should be calculated under former RCW 51.08.178(2) (1988), instead of former RCW 51.08.178(1). UPS argues that the trial court gave multiple erroneous jury instructions that require a new trial. Finding no error, we affirm the jury’s verdict and the trial court’s order remanding to L&I to calculate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rogers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Rogers v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrew Leitner v. City Of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. Port Of Longview v. London Market InsurersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API