Legal Opinion

Ago

Washington Attorney General Reports

Decided February 6, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Dean Sutherland State Senator P.O. Box 40417 Olympia, WA 98504-0417

Dear Senator Sutherland:

By letter previously acknowledged, you have asked for our opinion on several questions concerning certain statutes relating to fish guards. Fish guards prevent the passage of fish into devices that divert water from a lake, river, or stream. We have paraphrased your inquiries as follows:

1. Must the director of the Department of Fish Wildlife take civil enforcement action in every instance where the director is aware that a device diverting water from a lake, river, or stream is not equipped…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. California v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Scannell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kitsap County v. Kev, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API