Legal Opinion
Kitsap County v. Kev, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1986No. 52185-9PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.
Facts of Case
The trial court enjoined Kev, Inc., its officers and other persons closely connected with an erotic dance studio from operating any such studio in Kitsap County. We affirm the injunction as modified.
On February 7, 1983, the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners passed ordinance 92 regulating erotic dance studios. A month later, ordinance 92 was amended by ordinance 92-A. The ordinances put time, place and manner restrictions on topless and erotic dancing in Kitsap County.
Kev, Inc., obtained a license pursuant to these ordinances and in June 1983 opened an erotic dance studio…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Vance v. Universal Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- O'DAY v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Grundy v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.