Legal Opinion

California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 28, 1990No. 89-333PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case concerns overlapping federal and state regulation of a hydroelectric project located near a California stream. California seeks to ensure that the project’s operators maintain water flowing in the stream sufficient, in the State’s judgment, to protect the stream’s fish. The Federal Government claims the exclusive authority to set the minimum stream flows that the federally licensed powerplant must maintain. Each side argues that its position is consistent with the Federal Power Act, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, as amended, 16 U. S. C. §791a et seq. (1982 ed.), and, in particular, with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API