Legal Opinion

United States v. One Silk Rug

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 30, 1908No. 39PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. There was no opinion below. The full title of this cause is United States, Plaintiff in Error,- v. One Silk Rug Eately Imported into the United States, John Dunn, Jr., and Davies, Turner & Company, Claimants, Defendants in: Error.'

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This was a proceeding brought by:. the; ¡United States in the District Court for, the Eastern District of *975Pennsylvania to forfeit a silk rüg. The rug was' purchased’ by Samuel Small in Cairo, Egypt, from Hatoun, a dealer, for ¿457, of which sum $500 was paid in advance. The balance was to be paid by Small on delivery of the rug to him, free of duties and- transportation charges-, at his home in York, Pa. Hatoun shipped the rug to,Davies, Turner & Co., importing agents, with-instructions to collect ¿362, and accompanied the instructions and bill of lading with a…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Jen Dao Chen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Twenty Boxes of CheeseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1908
  4. United States v. 646 Half-Boxes of FigsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1908
  5. United States v. MescallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API