Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Madlom
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 2004No. 20040280PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] On May 4, 2004, Bruce L. Mad-lom admitted service of the Summons and Petition for Discipline. The Petition for Discipline asserts that Madlom was admitted to practice law in the State of North Dakota on September 25, 1989, and has been an attorney at law since that time.
[¶2] The Petition further asserts in May of 2003, Bonnie Bell retained Madlom for the purpose of filing a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, and Bell agreed to pay $750 for Madlom to prepare and file the bankruptcy petition and represent her at the first meeting of creditors. Bell also agreed to pay the $200 filing fee for filing the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. MadlomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Board v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. RozanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. RozanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.