Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Karlsen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2008No. 20080294, 20080295PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISBARMENT ORDERED.

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] On May 21, 2008, a Petition for Discipline was filed asserting Bent Karlsen was admitted to practice as an attorney in the courts of North Dakota on November 27, 2002, and his name has appeared on the roll of attorneys since that date. Effective December 31, 2006, Karlsen’s license to practice law was suspended for non-compliance with continuing legal education requirements.

[¶ 2] The Petition alleges Karlsen was the attorney for Olgun Fuat Sahin in an immigration matter. Karlsen charged Satan $1,200 for what Karlsen’s fee agreement describes as a “flat non-refundable…

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KarlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Disciplinary Board v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API