Legal Opinion
Diversified Group, Inc. v. Daugerdas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 5, 2003No. Nos. 00 Civ. 077(SAS), 00 Civ. 6484(SAS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Diversified Group, Inc. (“DGI”), Paul Daugerdas, and Jenkens & Gilchrist (“J & G”) (collectively, “respondents”) have filed objections to the Report of the Special Master Relating to Motion of American Lawyer Media, Inc. For Leave to Intervene and For Unsealing (“Report”). I have duly considered respondents’ objections. For the reasons set forth below, the Report is accepted and adopted with two additions.
1. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 9, 2003, American Lawyer Media, Inc. (“ALM”) moved for an order unsealing documents submitted by the parties in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Robbins & Myers, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Newmarkets Partners, LLC v. Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie. S.C.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Ello v. SinghDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Mohr v. Security Credit Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.