Legal Opinion
Mohr v. Security Credit Services, LLC
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 23, 2015No. 1:14-CV-981 (MAD/CFH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CHRISTIAN F. HUMMEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Mohr brought this action against defendants Security Credit Services, LLC (“SCS”); Lacy Katzen, LLP (“Lacy Katzen”); Mark H. Stein; and Michael J. Wegman (collectively “defendants,” where appropriate) for alleged unlawful credit and collections practices, pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. Presently before the Court is plaintiffs motion to compel discovery. Dkt. No. 43. Defendants opposed the motion. Dkt. Nos. 44, 45. For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Lou Dibella and Dibella Entertainment, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Bernard Hopkins, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Antoinette C. Taylor v. Phyllis A. FrazierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Klein v. Affiliated Group, Inc., TheDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Valentine v. Sperry Tents HamptonsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025