Legal Opinion

Swidler & Berlin v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 1998No. 97-1192PublishedCited by 367 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

Petitioner James Hamilton, an attorney, made notes of an initial interview with a client shortly before the client’s death. The Government, represented by the Office of Independent Counsel, now seeks his notes for use in a criminal investigation. We hold that the notes are protected by the attorney-client privilege.

This dispute arises out of an investigation conducted by the Office of the Independent Counsel into whether various individuals made false statements, obstructed justice, or committed other crimes during investigations of the 1998 dismissal of employees from the White House Travel…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by367 opinions

  1. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Campbell v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Branch v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Ronald C. Denius v. Wayne Dunlap and Gary Sadler 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

362 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API