Legal Opinion
Kohlmayer v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 20, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-5455 (NHP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLITAN, District Judge.
Dear Counsel:
This matter comes before the Court on appeal from Magistrate Judge Ronald J. Hedges Order’ denying an application of Marvin I. Barish, Esquire (“Mr.Barish”) for pro hac vice admission to this Court. 1 The Court heard oral argument on this matter on September 29, 2000. For the reasons articulated herein, Judge Hedges’ Order of August 17, 2000 is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Mr. Barish is seeking pro hac vice admission in this case as plaintiffs counsel. The plaintiff, Mr. Matthew Kohlmayer (“Mr.Kohlmayer”) was allegedly injured in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Nick C. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, Theatre & Cinema, Inc., Philhamboro, Inc., Youngstown Theatre Corporation and Modern Playhouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kaung v. Cole National Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. HuberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- In Re Complaint of PMD Enterprises Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Kampitch v. LachDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
- Pease v. BurnsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.