Legal Opinion

Highland Park Realty Co. v. City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1935No. Civil No. 3657PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— -Highland Park Realty Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against the city of Tucson, a municipal corporation, Bradley R. Metcalf, as its superintendent of streets, and Chas. C. Irvin, as its treasurer, hereinafter called defendants, to have certain assessment liens and bonds declared invalid, and to enjoin defend ants from ever attempting to sell the lands of plaintiff under any of said liens. The facts set forth in the complaint were not denied by defendants, but a demurrer was filed which raised the questions of their sufficiency as a matter of law. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. WhitsettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Fitzgerald v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. RandallArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cyr & Evans Contracting Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API