Homan v. Wayer320
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action brought to recover from the defendant Wayer, as a notary public, and the defendant corporation as surety on his notarial bond, the sum of $550, damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of a false and deceptive certificate of acknowledgment made by said notary. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
On the twenty-eighth day of November, 1903, plaintiff, who was then living in Omaha, Nebraska, purchased from one J. A. Overholtzer, who was acting under the assumed name of Carl Anderson,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lammon v. FeusierSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. MurfeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Joost v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. AronsohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Transamerica Title Insurance v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Ryan v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Jordan v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hemet Home Builders Association v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.