Anderson v. Aronsohn
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of. San Francisco. E. P. Shortall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action against a notary public and his sureties on his official bond to recover for damages alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the notary.
It appears from the findings that a few days prior to April 19, 1916, one Ambrose, a real estate agent and loan broker, through whom plaintiff had previously' loaned money, called upon the plaintiff to secure a loan of nine hundred dollars upon certain real estate in the city and county of San Francisco owned by Louetta A. Pilliken, for whom Ambrose purported to act. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hatton v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Joost v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Overacre v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- State ex rel. Kleinsorge v. MeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
- Homan v. Wayer320California Court of Appeal · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Garton v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Transamerica Title Insurance v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hemet Home Builders Association v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hoffman v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.