Oakland Bank of Savings v. Murfey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
— This is an action to recover damages upon the bond of defendant Murfey, as a notary public.
Defendant had judgment, from which, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.
*457The findings in the case show, among other things, —
1. That the defendant Murfey was, on the third day of June, 1876, appointed a notary public for San Francisco, and gave bond in five thousand dollars, with Theodore Leroy and Michael Beese as sureties.
2. That on the 29th of November, 1876, Wright Leroy came to the office of Murfey in San Francisco, and introducing himself as M. B.…
2Cited by30 opinions
- McEvoy v. American Pool Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
- County of Alameda v. TieslauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hatton v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Joost v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Girard v. Monrovia City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.