Legal Opinion

Seattle National Co. v. Gilmore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1932No. 23564. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant upon a promissory note, asking for judgment thereon, together with the foreclosure of mortgages and pledges of real and personal property which had been given by defendant as collateral security to the note. This note had been executed by defendant in favor of Seattle National Bank, the payee having, prior to the institution of this action, transferred all of its assets to the plaintiff herein, plaintiff conceding that it is not a holder of the note in due course, and that defenses good against the original payee may be urged as against plaintiff.

Defendant answered,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Williams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1912
  4. Kaufman v. KlainWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Morgan v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Riblet v. Ideal Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API