Legal Opinion

Riblet v. Ideal Cement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1961No. 35546PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, C. J.

— This is the latest in a series of actions brought by appellants against the Ideal Cement Company or its predecessor, the Spokane-Portland Cement Company. The objective of each action has been a money judgment for damage to appellants’ property, allegedly from cement dust emitted from respondent’s cement plant. In the first of these cases (which may be referred to for a detailed statement of the facts) we held that the two-year statute of limitations is applicable to the situation and limited recovery to a period running from 1948 to 1950. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co. (1952), 41 Wn.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lasser v. Grunbaum Bros. Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Riblet v. Ideal Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical ClinicWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Nielson v. Spanaway General Medical Clinic, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. HarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API