Legal Opinion
Mascari v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America Local Union No. 667
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1948PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pbewitt
The bill in this cause was filed by complainants, Joe Mascari and others, who are engaged in the wholesale distribution of produce in the city of Memphis and adjacent territory, seeking an injunction against the defendants to prevent the illegal calling of a strike.
*348Prior to the enactment of ■ Chapter 36 of the Pnblic Acts of 1947, there existed a contract between complainants and defendants provided for what is generally termed a closed shop. The Act referred to is known as the Tennessee Open Shop Law and reads as follows:
“An Act to prohibit and make unlawful the exclusion from employment of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Weakley County Municipal Electric System v. VickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- Genesco, Inc. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Farnsworth & Chambers Co. v. Local Union 429, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Large v. DickTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Nichols v. Tullahoma Open Door, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.