Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Tullahoma Open Door, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 25, 1982PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether T.C.A. §§ 13-24-101 — 13-24-104 violate certain provisions of the Constitutions of Tennessee and the United States. A secondary issue is whether the Sherrill Living Center, a group home for mentally retarded persons operated by defendant Tullahoma Open Door, Inc., is operated on a commercial basis and, therefore, not entitled to the benefits prescribed by T.C.A. §§ 13-24 — 101—13-24^104.

This case was commenced by plaintiffs seeking a declaratory judgment declaring the statutes at issue unconstitutional. Plaintiffs also…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Dearborne v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Berger v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Anglin v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Manning v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Dickerson v. Sanders Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. MC Properties, Inc. v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API