Nichols v. Tullahoma Open Door, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEWIS, Judge.
The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether T.C.A. §§ 13-24-101 — 13-24-104 violate certain provisions of the Constitutions of Tennessee and the United States. A secondary issue is whether the Sherrill Living Center, a group home for mentally retarded persons operated by defendant Tullahoma Open Door, Inc., is operated on a commercial basis and, therefore, not entitled to the benefits prescribed by T.C.A. §§ 13-24 — 101—13-24^104.
This case was commenced by plaintiffs seeking a declaratory judgment declaring the statutes at issue unconstitutional. Plaintiffs also…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dearborne v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Berger v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Anglin v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Manning v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Dickerson v. Sanders Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- MC Properties, Inc. v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.