Santa Rosa Bank v. White
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
This is a suit on a promissory note of the appellant and the other defendants, for the sum of $3,675.53, with interest, etc. The plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order denying the appellant defendant’s motion for a new trial the appeal is taken.
The defense is a discharge of the defendant in bankruptcy, under the act of July 1, 1898, (30 U. S. Stats. 544; U. S. Comp. Stats. 1901, p. 3418). The effect of this was to “release” the defendant, “from all of his provable debts,” with the exceptions named in section 17 of the act; which, so far as material, reads as follows: “A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- In re RhutasselDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899
- Tyrrel v. HammersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Gee v. GeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Collins v. McWaltersNew York Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fields, Garnishee, and Scott v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Lynch v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Van Denburgh v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Brown v. TroppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hibbard v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.