In re Rhutassel
District Court, N.D. Iowa
In Bankruptcy. Submitted on report and' certificate of referee,' with petilion for discharge and objections thereto.
1Opinion of the Court
SU IRAS, District Judge.
Upon the filing of the petition for discharge in this case, the Rank of Hampton objected to the granting a discharge to the bankrupt upon the ground that the debt due the bank, and which now exists in the form of a judgment, was created by false pretenses and fraudulent representations with respect to bis property on the part of the debtor; and it is further prayed that the court, if a discharge is granted, will find and adjudge that the discharge is not effective as against the claim of the bank, because of its fraudulent origin; and the creditors further ask that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In re ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1899
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kathleen Poolman v. William F. Poolman, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Harrison v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Talcott v. FriendCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Marshall Paper Co. v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. GolomboskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.